Money Inside's host discusses home prices, rates, and buying timing with Director Lee Hyun-chul ahead of 2027. Although mixed signals confuse the market, he diagnoses a dead-cat bounce after the 2021 blow-off top, the 2022-2023 decline, and the 2024-2026 rebound. Defining market energy as public attention, he contrasts the nationwide obsession of 2020-2021 with today's dispersion into coins, gold, and stocks, leaving weak follow-up demand. Partial Seoul gains are a balloon effect and an illusion; loan and tax rules keep eroding purchasing power so they will soon fade, and a full downturn will run at least 5 years. Rates and supply must be read under a speculative-market premise rather than a stable one, with sudden demand shifts and aggressiveness driving prices. He warns through field cases about overstretched buyers' breaking points, leverage risk, and lagging sentiment. Homeless buyers should wait for the jeonse-crunch buy signal, separate residence from investment, and stay conservative. All directional outlooks are the speakers' conditional judgments and do not confirm any short-term price forecast.

Money Inside

A confused market and downside preparation

Dead-cat bounce and market energy

The Seoul illusion, regulations, and cycles

The lake-and-river rate formula

Demand dominance, volume, and sentiment gauges

The breaking point of overstretched buyers

Fear psychology and the 3-year lag

Leverage and selling at the bottom

The jeonse-crunch buy signal

Income-fit prices and jeonse math

Conservative play and crowd psychology

Separating residence, investment, and true goals

Never trust this rebound: why buying blindly brings the worst 5 years (full interview)

Park Jong-hoon notes Seoul's 88 straight weeks and 17.9 percent cumulative gains with Gangnam fading and outskirts rotating up. Citing state research, he puts home-price drivers at 60.7 percent rates, 17.9 loan curbs, and 8.5 supply, previewing 6 factors: rates, regulation, stocks, bonuses, supply, and population. He recalls 2022's Legoland shock, 4.6 percent 10-year yields over 4 percent for 7 weeks, 558 Seoul deals in a month, and a 22 percent actual-price plunge. US rates at 5.25 percent in 2006 brought falls 15 months later and 27 percent down by 2012, showing high-rate effects lag 5 to 15 months. With 2026 rates near 2022 levels, mixed-loan resets, 2,020 trillion won in household credit, and 10-year-high delinquencies weigh. Hikes since month 5 bite fully around month 8 next year, while a 38 percent stock slide cuts equity-funded demand, leaving Samsung bonuses, tight supply, and retirements on the timetable. He concludes 2027 pits upward fuel against downward rates, urging viewers to watch base rates and 10-year signals. All directional outlooks are the speakers' conditional judgments and do not confirm any short-term price forecast.

Park Jong-hoon's Knowledge Punch

Stocks bent first. Can housing hold? (Park Jong-hoon's Knowledge Punch)

Center Head Hakkyun Kim contrasts the efficient-market view with value investing, where irrationality creates undervaluation that rewards waiting. Citing Paul Tudor Jones's call to stay short from next year, he sees the buyback-driven supply-shrink era giving way to a supply-expansion era of Treasuries and IPOs. Dilution math, that issuance at high prices pays, frames the issuance rush as a classic topping signal. He stays alert to the SpaceX IPO and a possible November (month 11) Anthropic listing while staying ambivalent toward AI fundraisers. He relays the paradox of profitable data centers serving loss-making users and a report that AI spending must match grocery bills to connect to revenue. Uncharted-road distrust of forecasts, the China variable, and Nvidia's 43 percent drawdown warn of wider volatility. He closes advising that enduring a stock worth being stuck in is half of investing. All directional views are the speaker's conditional judgment and do not confirm any near-term price forecast.

Jeungsigakdogi TV

There are always opportunities in the market | Hakkyun Kim, Shinyoung Securities research head #2 [Investment Insight]

Sensor Studio surveys European neighbors fortifying their borders against Russia. It covers Lithuania's Kaliningrad-facing troops, its constitutional amendment push, and the stationed German brigade. It details Estonia's forward move of the 1st Brigade, defense spending at 5.4% of GDP, and the shift from guerrilla-style defense to holding the border line. It reports Latvia's completed 280 km and 145 km walls, defense spending at 4.91% of GDP, and conscription revived in 2023. It lays out Poland's 2 trillion 7 thousand hundred-million won East Shield with 28 K2 tanks, and Finland's 200 km fence with forces of 100 ten-thousand troops by 2031. It reads together the 4,474 bunkers of the 3 Baltic states, the forward-defense and deterrence logic, the Gotland exercise with NATO Article 5, and Kaliningrad with the time factor. All directional views are the speaker's conditional judgment and do not confirm any near-term price forecast.

Sensor Studio

Europe builds 4,474 bunkers on the Russian border as the 'iron wall' rises again

Bloomberg Television reports that China is leading the race to develop the sophisticated robotic hand, the key bottleneck for humanoids. Humanoids that can run or dance are now possible, but replicating the coordination and pressure control of the human hand remains the hardest challenge, it explains. By some estimates, Chinese companies accounted for 97% of global humanoid shipments in the first half of 2026. It explains that about 10 years ago the Chinese government made humanoids a national priority and has nurtured the industry with subsidies and a supply chain in and beyond Shenzhen. With a low birth rate pushing manufacturers to replace workers with robots, Morgan Stanley projects the humanoid market could reach $5 trillion by mid-century, 1,000 times its current size. The US leads in frontier AI, but China has the edge in real-life applications, and more than 140 hundred-million dollars have flowed into the sector this year. For now, though, most robotic hands are still prototypes rather than commercial products, and the next race is coming down to who can train humanoids best. All directional forecasts are the speaker's conditional judgments, not definitive predictions of short-term prices.

Bloomberg Television

Why China Is Racing to Build the Ultimate Robotic Hand

Hong Jang-won reports that ahead of the Black Monday anniversary on the 19th, semiconductor-led declines continued despite CoreWeave default risks and Jensen Huang's defensive remarks. Goldman Sachs analysis sees AI-long and Treasury-short positions unwinding together, and since corporate rates equal Treasury rates plus credit spreads, spread spikes can lift corporate rates even as Treasury rates fall, he explains. In the bearish scenario, credit cracks climb the chain from CoreWeave and Oracle through investment-grade to high-yield, verbal intervention is losing effect, and AI-focused fund liquidation rumors plus 6 straight trading days of hedge-fund net selling feed a vicious cycle. With PPI gains above 6%, even the rate-cut card is hard to play. In the bullish scenario, an 8-trading-day 20% KOSPI drop has happened only three times, in 1997, 2008, and 2020, with fast rebounds after, and Nvidia, Broadcom, and Micron at 13 times forward P/E sit at post-dotcom-bust Cisco levels. TSMC's results on the 15th beat on revenue and guidance with demand outrunning supply and record capex, and the US cannot easily stop AI investment amid its hegemonic race with China, he explains. Since the 19th marks the 1987 Black Monday anniversary, anxiety is amplified, and he adds to watch Blackstone's results on the 22nd and Intel's the next day. All directional forecasts are the speaker's conditional judgments, not definitive predictions of short-term prices.

Maeil Business Live

[Hong Jang-won's Bull & Bear] Another Black Monday on the 19th? Or is the market just scaring us

Kim Dante examines whether AI stocks are heading for the worst-case scenario amid another AI fund liquidation rumor and CoreWeave contagion spreading across data centers. He names CoreWeave as the driver of the overnight Nasdaq drop of more than 2%, reporting its plunge of more than 11%, a fall of nearly 60% from its high, and a CDS-implied bankruptcy probability of 60%. He lays out the Nvidia connection as the company Nvidia nurtured, Jensen Huang’s denial of rescue financing alongside his optimism, forward valuation at a multiyear low, and criticism of the neocloud model. He reports the Vara AI fund’s end-June (month 6) 13F holdings list and its 26 billion dollars under management, the forced-selling suspicion from 1.4 times versus 0.75 times volume, and the manager’s denial. He presents Dell’s warning of worsening memory shortages against Musk’s view that 2028 could be a different story if China expands LP5 and LP6 output quickly, with HBM as the exception. He flags falling bond prices of big-tech-backstopped projects as his worst-case scenario and worries about a self-reinforcing squeeze of higher funding rates on new projects and shrinking AI capex. He closes with the on-device open-model variable, Apple’s defensive character, positive AWS signals, and Cathie Wood’s CoreWeave buying, while contagion remains his biggest worry. All directional views are the speaker’s conditional judgments and do not confirm any short-term price prediction.

Naeileun Toojawang - Kim Dante

Another AI fund liquidation? CoreWeave contagion? Are AI stocks heading for the worst-case scenario?

Eddie of the US Stocks Channel explains the Friday plunge amid AI bubble collapse fears. Despite falling October (month 10) rate hike odds and steady market rates, he traces the two reasons for the 2% Nasdaq drop to CoreWeave and 110 dollar oil. He compares the CoreWeave debt and circular financing scare to the 2023 Silicon Valley Bank run and weighs a possible Nvidia backstop. Citing next week Big Tech earnings and bullish fund manager sentiment, he argues a rotation correction. Every directional outlook is the speaker's conditional judgment and does not confirm any short term price forecast.

US Stocks Channel - Eddie

Has the AI bubble started bursting? Should I sell right now

Patrick Boyle reports that a collapse chart of AfD online activity shared by a member of the European Parliament was an unverified graph containing days of future data through Wednesday despite being posted on Sunday. Germany's DW found no source, platform, or metric, no mention of the AfD, and even distorted axis scaling, while Germany's Capital traced its origin to a Threads account, he explains. Ukrainian drones struck 3 of Yandex's 6 data centers, yet according to Cloudflare the traffic that collapsed was mostly Yandex search crawlers, with no unexpected change in social posting, replies, or likes. Real damage froze payments, bus timetables, and apartment gates, and the 2014 data-localization law shielded Russia's internet from sanctions while pinning it within drone range. Troll activity runs on distributed infrastructure such as residential connections, phone farms, and compromised TV boxes rather than data centers, with the 911S5 and Melorator takedowns and a 70-country manipulation report presented as evidence. Western political outrage is a high-margin export of the overseas outrage-content industry, where view rates differ by 15 to 75 times and engagement, not accuracy, is the goal. MIT, Science, and Facebook research shows fake-news spread is driven mostly by real people, super-sharers, and unflagged skeptical stories rather than bots. All directional forecasts are the speaker's conditional judgments, not definitive predictions of short-term prices.

Patrick Boyle

A viral chart with future data

The Yandex sites the drones hit, and the trolls that did not fall

The economy the localization law pinned within drone range

Recovery, responsibility, and data-sovereignty lessons

The real troll infrastructure and its operators

Outrage as a high-margin export

Real people are the spreaders

The digital slime mold and the lines of defense

Did Ukraine Just Bomb the Russian Bots?

A learning note diagnosing the current rebound as a dead-cat bounce, with rates, demand, leverage risks, and guidance for first-time buyers.

Never trust this rebound: why buying blindly brings the worst 5 years (full interview)

Timeline

Was this helpful?

Questions & opinions