Japan’s successive financial-institution crises
1997.11~1998
Failures of major financial institutions undermined financial confidence and household and corporate spending decisions.
An observation interval grouping crises at major institutions with real-economy impacts. Resolution ended at different times for each institution.
Conditions at the time
Financial-sector vulnerabilities emerged amid a weak economic recovery.
How events unfolded
In 1997/11, crises at Sanyo Securities, Hokkaido Takushoku Bank and Yamaichi Securities overlapped.
Stakeholders and impacts
Financial institutions, customers, the Bank of Japan, households and businesses responded to the shock.
Information available at the time
A 1998 Bank of Japan survey reflected concerns that institutional failures could affect employment and income.
Findings confirmed later
Research analyzed how financial instability and weakening consumption and investment affected one another.
Alternative interpretations and limitations
Consumption-tax changes and the Asian crisis also overlapped, so the entire recession is not attributed solely to institutional failures.
Interpretation using later sources
A 2000 paper by BOJ researchers examines rising money growth alongside weak consumption and investment during financial anxiety. Risk premiums and financing conditions improved as anxiety eased in 1999. The governor's later retrospective also connects the financial crisis with prolonged deflation. ASSETCASTING interpretation: Central-bank liquidity and bank credit transmission are different indicators. Assess lenders' capacity and household anxiety alongside money supplied, rather than inferring real effects from liquidity alone.
Evidence coverage through 2019-07-22 · Sources checked 2026-10-14
Related events and periods1
- Global economic integration, IT investment, and recurring financial crises
An event or period whose recorded start falls within this editorial interval. This does not establish that it caused or represents the characteristics of the era, nor guarantee that the entire period falls within the interval.
Historical events do not guarantee future recurrence or investment performance.