Toss mini appMarket TrainerEnable notifications in the app to get alerts when new study notes are published.New note alerts

Glaciers accelerated after an ice shelf disappeared — Larsen B

Changes in glacier speed and thickness were observed after the Larsen B collapse. The case distinguishes floating-ice loss from additional land-ice discharge.

Updated Oct 28, 2026

Why should the loss of floating ice be examined together with land glaciers?
Verified facts

Collapse and subsequent observations

NASA records the Larsen B ice shelf collapse in 2002. Subsequent satellite observations showed nearby glaciers accelerating and thinning.

Sources [1][2]
Interpretation

Direct melting versus loss of restraint

The key is not just the floating ice itself but the subsequent change in land-glacier flow. Weaker shelf restraint can increase land-ice discharge to the ocean, a pathway missed by considering only the direct effect.

Sources [2]
Limitations

No prediction of identical rates

This is a historical observation in a particular region. It alone cannot predict when other shelves will collapse, how their glacier speeds will change or total sea-level rise.

Sources

  1. NASA: Larsen B Ice Shelf CollapseAccessed Oct 28, 2026
  2. NASA JPL: Glaciers Surge When Ice Shelf Breaks UpAccessed Oct 28, 2026